Serpentine aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery: Case report
Views: 22DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37085/nsa.2025.3Keywords:
Serpentine aneurysm, Fusiform aneurysm, Endovascular managementAbstract
The serpentine aneurysm is an infrequent vascular anomaly, representing less than 0.1% of all aneurysms. It is defined by a substantial fusiform aneurysm exceeding 25 mm in diameter, frequently exhibiting partial thrombosis and maintaining a serpiginous vascular channel. This condition is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, presenting considerable therapeutic challenges. Recent advancements in endovascular therapies have transformed the management of serpentine aneurysms, which are now considered the gold standard. These techniques incorporate both reconstructive and obstructive methods, often utilizing parent vessel occlusion testing to achieve favorable patient outcomes. This case report discusses a 39-year-old male presenting with headaches and right-sided transient paresthesia. Imaging, including computed tomography, revealed a partially thrombosed aneurysm in the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) region. Subsequent cerebral angiography confirmed serpentine opacification in the frontal M2 segment, characterized by sluggish flow terminating in a distal parent artery branch. The patient underwent elective embolization following parent vessel occlusion testing, which demonstrated retrograde filling of the cortical branch via a leptomeningeal anastomosis. Embolization involved the use of platinum coils to occlude both the aneurysm and its parent vessel. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged two days after the procedure. Understanding the unique angiographic features of serpentine aneurysms is crucial for effective management.
References
Atallah O, Hammoud Z, Aljeradat B, Almealawy YF, Badary A, Elqader JA, et al. A comprehensive analysis and systematic review of giant serpentine aneurysms. Annals of Medicine & Surgery 2025;87:1458–66. Doi:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003000
Anson JA, Lawton MT, Spetzler RF. Characteristics and surgical treatment of dolichoectatic and fusiform aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1996;84:185–93. Doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0185
Romano A, Moltoni G, Piazza A, Trasimeni G, Miscusi M, Palizzi S, et al. Giant serpentine aneurysm: Neuroradiological and neurosurgical management in a left-handed patient. Radiol Case Rep 2023;18:4384–8. Doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2023.09.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.09.014
Segal HD, McLaurin RL. Giant serpentine aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1977;46:115–20. Doi:10.3171/jns.1977.46.1.0115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1977.46.1.0115
Aletich VA, Debrun GM, Monsein LH, Nauta HJ, Spetzler RF. Giant serpentine aneurysms: a review and presentation of five cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1061–72.
Kandemirli SG, Cekirge S, Oran I, Saatci I, Kizilkilic O, Cinar C, et al. Intracranial Serpentine Aneurysms: Spontaneous Changes of Angiographic Filling Pattern. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018;39:1662–8. Doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5746
van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN. Endovascular Treatment of Giant Serpentine Aneurysms: Fig 1. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008;29:1418–9. Doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1071
Christiano LD, Gupta G, Prestigiacomo CJ, Gandhi CD. Giant serpentine aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26:E5. Doi:10.3171/2009.2.FOCUS0918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.FOCUS0918